Your reliable guide in the crypto world, providing comprehensive news and analysis on all things related to cryptocurrency.

‘The market could have decided’

• Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has expressed her dissenting opinion on the SEC’s lawsuit against blockchain firm LBRY.

• Peirce stated that she felt “unsettled” following the SEC’s enforcement action against LBRY in March 2021. LBRY appealed the decision but announced in October that it planned to wind down due to legal costs.

• Peirce criticized the SEC’s approach, stating that the case against LBRY was “puzzling” as there was no evidence of fraud and the firm took a conservative approach to digital assets compared to other crypto projects.

• Peirce suggested that there had been no clear path for a project like LBRY to register with the SEC, and the excessive remedies sought by the commission were disproportionate and harmful to innovation.

• Peirce believes that the resources expended on this case could have been better utilized in building a workable regulatory framework that companies like LBRY could have followed, allowing the market to decide their fate.

• Peirce has been a dissenting voice at the SEC in crypto-related enforcement cases and has previously stated that the commission is “far behind” in finding a solution for a regulatory framework.

• SEC Chair Gary Gensler has urged crypto firms to engage with the regulator to avoid enforcement actions, but the SEC has filed lawsuits against various crypto exchanges and firms.

Sources: [coinpostman, SEC]

![Image](https://images.coinpostman.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=90,width=840/https://s3.coinpostman.com/uploads/2023-10/fa22b53a-e9cc-4df7-b8b4-3c5cd6f7eea9.jpg)

Hester Peirce of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a dissenting opinion on the regulator’s lawsuit against blockchain firm LBRY.

In an Oct. 27 statement, Peirce described feeling “unsettled” following the SEC’s enforcement action against LBRY in March 2021. In November 2022, a judge ruled in favor of the SEC, stating that the firm’s LBC token was a security. Though LBRY appealed the decision, the company announced in October that it planned to wind down, citing millions of dollars in debt due to legal costs.

“This case illustrates the arbitrariness and real-life consequences of the Commission’s misguided enforcement-driven approach to crypto,” said Peirce.

According to Peirce, the SEC’s case against LBRY was “puzzling” given there was no evidence of fraud and the firm took a conservative approach to digital assets compared to other crypto projects. The SEC commissioner suggested that there had been no clear path for a project like LBRY to come in and register with the regulator, and “it would not be a particularly useful effort” if it had managed to do so.

“[T]he Commission took an extremely hardline approach in this case,” said Peirce. “For example, after winning on summary judgment, the Commission sought monetary remedies of $44 million and asserted that LBRY’s offer to burn all tokens in its possession was not sufficient assurance that LBRY would not violate the registration provisions in the future. The Commission’s requested remedies were entirely out of proportion to any harm.”

She added:

“The time and resources we expended on this case could have been devoted to building a workable regulatory framework that companies like LBRY could have followed. Then the market could have decided LBRY’s fate.”

“The Commission’s action forced a group of entrepreneurs to abandon what they built,” said Peirce. “Our disproportionate reaction in this case will dissuade people from experimenting with blockchain technology.”

Related: SEC revises $22M penalty against LBRY, seeks $111K instead

Peirce has often been a dissenting voice at the SEC in crypto-related enforcement cases. In September, she told Coinpostman that crypto firms shouldn’t give up on trying to launch in the United States, but added she believed the commission was “far behind” in finding a solution for a regulatory framework.

Gary Gensler, who chairs the SEC, has often called on crypto firms to “come in and talk” to the regulator to avoid potential enforcement actions. To date, the regulator has filed lawsuits against crypto exchanges Binance and Coinbase, and many other firms in the space.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?